CG13 Rev limiter removal by distributor modifications.

Someone told me of a mod that can be done to the inside of the distributor on a cg13 that removes the 6k5 rev limit. I'm a bit reluctant to say here what it is, but has anyone reading this heard of it? I don't understand how the ecu reacts to the changed signal.
 
I'll say it.

Sounds like you've been talking to someone who 1) you should never buy a car from 2) never let touch anything you own. :p
 
used to be able to do it on old rover V8's... cos they sued the spring inside of the dissy to act as an ignition cut off for the rev limiter.

but 6.5k?.......mine goes off the clock.. (sometimes..lol)
 
My pre-facelift has a limiter. So dunno where u've got that from Squarepants

i was told that prefaclifts cg13's didnt have them, wasnt to sure just thought it may be of some help! made me look silly really :p

are we talking about the top speed limter here? or the rev limter?
 
Ah I'm not sure on that, I know I have a limiter of some kind. I can't tell if it's a rev limiter due to the fact I don't have a rev counter. lol.

Also my cars off the road at the mo due to it being dead :'(
 
there is a rev limiter on all cars (well most, some early 1950's cars used to just run out of power or get valve bounce)

the face-lift micra's have got a speed limiter (like all jap cars after 1998 with the gentlemans agreement in japan.....like the skyline)

the pre-facelift ones dont have a limiter, (they have a rev limit, so the engine doesnt blow up but no speed limter...its just runs out of puff at 120 something..)
 
the face-lift micra's have got a speed limiter (like all jap cars after 1998 with the gentlemans agreement in japan.....like the skyline)

the pre-facelift ones dont have a limiter, (they have a rev limit, so the engine doesnt blow up but no speed limter...its just runs out of puff at 120 something..)

thats the limter iam on about!, the top speed limiter not the the revlimiter lol

the facelift's limiter is at 115mph so i belive, but who need's to go that fast when the max speed you do is 70mph.

if you are looking to remove this i think you would be looking at the ecu side of things, not to sure tho!
 
So many myths. No wonder everyone gets so confused all the time!

Ok the bottom line on this:

Every K11 has a RPM limiter. Its around 6900. There is no exception to this.
It is possible that the K11 has a speed limiter - pete will confirm on this. However unless you have a turbo you wont hit it - period!

You cannot remove the RPM or Speed limit by playing with the distributor.

The only way you can remove the RPM limit is to reprogram the ECU.

Everyother myth that you have heard in contradiction to this is wrong. :p
 
yep, everything ed says there is correct

all k11's have rev limiters, some are different to others, the cg13 tends to be lower than the cg10, the limit cannot be removed but it can be raised.

also all k11's have speed limiters, it justs not all of them "use it" or have one low enough to hit in normal situations
 
my old mk3 escort xr3i had one on the rotor arm,swopped it for one off a carb modle and wayhay 7500rpm flyer went from about 112mph flatout to around 125,,,,,why carnt things be that easy today and it only cost about £4.00......

yep, everything ed says there is correct

all k11's have rev limiters, some are different to others, the cg13 tends to be lower than the cg10, the limit cannot be removed but it can be raised.

also all k11's have speed limiters, it justs not all of them "use it" or have one low enough to hit in normal situations


and there's no point in raising the limiter until you change your cams anyway
 
what age is your pre face lift? mine is 97 in the middle of alot of changes i.e got anti roll bars and limiter but it id not the face lift.
 
the face-lift micra's have got a speed limiter (like all jap cars after 1998 with the gentlemans agreement in japan.....like the skyline)


Its been around a lot longer than 1998.

the face-lift micra's have got a speed limiter (like all jap cars after 1998 with the gentlemans agreement in japan.....like the skyline)


Its been around a lot longer than 1998. The speed limiter in japan is a government enforced rule at 180km/hr.
 
Thats why i use the Cg10 ECU on the cg13, with a Mapped Apexi. Although E-manage is really the way to go. If i had money that is. :)
 
If your car isnt controlled by a ECU (k11's excluded) there is normally a mechanism in the distributor housing that when cut, soldered on any other bodge can remove the limiter.
 
just so people are aware, i have just been informed very reliably that it is possible to remove the rpm limit within the dizzy.

i have no reason to doubt this is possble
 
just so people are aware, i have just been informed very reliably that it is possible to remove the rpm limit within the dizzy.

i have no reason to doubt this is possble

could you shed any light on how to do this? not that i will, just curiosity!
 
Just noticed this thread, the RPM limit can be removed by modification to the dizzy however their is a second limiter in the ecu which cuts the fuel at a set RPM.

Mike
 
Sorry but I think thats nonsense.

The dizzy provides the crank angle and cam position sensor. Both are vital for the engine to run and both are required for the engine to run. The distributor also contains the coil and ignition driver, usually separate but all contained on the K11.

I am open to suggestions but I'd like to see someone demonstrate HOW by altering any of this that 1, the engine would still run and 2, remove the limiter, unless for some unknown reason that the dist has a limiter below that of the ecu alone.
 
ed. im thinking the ecu thinks the engine speed is set at at certain rpm, im not going to go into how its done, as someone charges to do, so im not going to cause problems for them.

ta
 
I still dont beleve it, and anything that makes the ecu think that its at a fixed rpm will cause all manner of problems to everything else.

I am going to do a little experiment and see weather the stock dizzy does have a limiter in it or not.
 
I have a stock dist sitting on my desk now, I also hope to have a method by which to spin it at around 4000 rpm equil 8000 engine rpm. I then have a feq counter to count pulses and also oscilliscope to watch the outputs.

I hope at some point this evening show if there is a limiter in these things or not..
 
well its early days yet but this is not like any other CAS ive seen before on an eccs system, there is still a chance i shall be eating my own words yet...

IMG_0961.jpg

That is an image of the crank position wheel. Now I admit that I always thought that this generation of ECCS had 360 degree slits and not a 4 position toothed wheel and a 5marker point like this. Very odd. Now i have heard that by modifying this it supposidly removes the limiter. It still doesnt make sense, and modification to this wheel especially the tdc marker would ruin an hopes of the ecu knowing where the engine is for sequential injection.. Perhaps with carbs this wouldnt be an issue...
 
this is the inside of the cas pickup. It also contains the coil driver transistor.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0965.jpg
    IMG_0965.jpg
    161.3 KB · Views: 939
Ok getting more in depth now. Further investigation shows that the CAS on the K11 is a simple single signal output, unlike the Pulsar, March ST, B13 etc N14 series of ecus, which have two signal outputs. This is really quite odd. I wonder how many other Nissans share this. I am now going to power the sensor up and have a look at its outputs and see what it does.
 
ed it controls something like the 300zx (power transistor?) that goes on the left cam cover

cause on consult we sometimes get the fault code "ignition signal primary" from the k11's which is the bit you posted up and its the same fault on the 300zx's when the power transistor goes faulty so maybe they are alike in someway in what they control?
 
I have circled the main parts to this module.
IMG_0965-1.jpg
The area in blue is soely responsible for the CAS pickup. The bit in red is the ignition coil driver, and the bit circled in red/pink is the actual ignition transistor for the coil. Its quite interesting since you dont often see the transistors without a case on them (usually metal or plastic).

I now have the cas driver working:
IMG_0967-1.jpg
It's output is a pull to ground (hence why I have the 10K pull up resistor. Now im going to spin the disk within the cas and see if it cuts out at all. If it doesnt then there is no rpm limiter, and its a trick that fools the ecu in some way....
 
I can now state that at an equilivent of 8256 RPM there is NO cut on the output from the distributor. I shall show how I did this in a moment.
 
Ok test setup:

IMG_0971.jpg

I am using a motor which would be used to start model planes etc, its not an extremely fast motor, but it is torquey, and ideal for this. In fact indirectly this test has in fact measured the speed of that motor! In any case you can see it driving the spindle side of the K11 dist.

On the output from the CAS I have this:

IMG_0969.jpg

You are looking at a frequency counter on the left which counts the pulses out of the CAS (number of pulses per second), and on the right an Oscilloscope which shows the waveform from the CAS.

As you can see from the above image the Freq counter is showing 398 pulses a second. Now for every rotation of the dist spindle there are 5 pulses. So

398/5 = 79.6 Revolutions a second.

x60 for RPM

79.6x60 = 4776 RPM

The Distributor rotates at half the engine speed so now multiply this by 2 to give the equalivent engine RPM

4776x2 = 9552 RPM

So at 9552 RPM you can clearly see that the dist is still functioning as it should do.

So what's been discovered?

My thoughts:
The K11 CAS output waveform consists of a start pulse followed by 4 longer timing pulses. The start pulse is the constant by which all the engine timing is measured, modifying or altering this will render the timing of the engine inaccurate and it may or may not even run at all. I can see how it may be possible to change the markings on this disk to alter the way in which the ecu responds to the rpm limits, however if as I have been informed its done by elongating the start mark then this may only lead to upset the engines timings elsewhere. Since I don't know exacly what is involved by this I cannot really comment, but what I can say however is that the distributor as it is has NO RPM limit built in. (at least to 9600rpm) Therefor conventional rpm removal or lifting (by ecu programming) will work as expected.

Ed
 
You are at work aren't you and all that gear isn't in your house? Either that you work from home lol

Daz
 
Actually thats a desk in my bedroom :blush: Claire would kill me if I put all this in the living or dining room, and the garage is too full of car parts and cold haha.
 
Ed is officially supergeek. lol

*hats off to you*

Anyway so unless there's different dizzys used by the CG's (something like what 59bhp was saying, and I recall something about nissan changing them due to faulty CAS sensors which would overheat and stop working, causing the engine to stall and not restart until they cooled down) what Ed has found is that there is a way to trick the ECU into letting the engine spin faster?

I gather this is another one of these cheapy modifications people do to these cars to get more power from them and the results could often be unpredictable?
 
I have already contacted Matt, hopefully he will help.

I wanted to establish weather there was a RPM limiter in the dist in the traditional sense. I.e. above x-RPM the unit stops sending signels. This is what I wouldn't accept, and as I imagined it doesn't. However having modifying the sensor wheel is somewhat a different modification. I am surprised it works and this area is what I am hoping may may help with.
 
so the limiter is in the ECU only? Not in both like previously stated. So what does modification of the sensor wheel do? Trick the ECU in thinking its at a lower RPM?
 
Back
Top