I want to say one or two things...
1st ) In my opinion is the worst mistake to use larger (2mm as someone said) headgasket ...sooner or later the engine is gonna have problem with its timing...you see our engines are with timing chain and not with belt...in that order there is major danger the engine to loose the timing...and then our valves are totaled...
2nd)The N/A compresion i can say that works PERFECT without any problems at all...its only 9:1 cr so i cant see the need to lower the compresion...its allready too low for tadays cars...i used the n/a compresion to my engine i dont have any problems until now...to say so...in future i indeent to raise the compresion ratio from the pistons...
I will add a few things. Point 2 is pretty subjective and really needs more explanation to elaborate on what 'works PERFECT without any problems' actually means. Information like this could lead to people blowing engines left right and centre.
A standard engine on standard compression will run to a point, but only to a point! This has been proven more times than I can remember and resulted in a large number of engines being blown up as a result. This is due to 2 main factors 1). Taking engine management out of the prespective for a while, people get boost hungry and simply turn up the boost, this either results in 2 failures. Failure 1 is a blown headgasket and Failure 2 is usually blown rings, as the CG series engine's rings are pretty useless for anything more than about 7psi. This is a well known fact from powerman268 from Japan and he's probably turbocharged more K11's in CG13, GA16, SR20DE(T), SR20VE(T) form than anyone I have seen or heard of, also this again has been done plenty of times in the past. They are also pretty useless in N/A form when you are pushing good rpm on a CG long stroke engine but this is another matter entirely.
It is a common misconception that in order to turbocharge an otherwise designed naturally aspirated engine you must first lower the static compression ratio. While this is an obvious choice and does make things very simple, it is not always the case. I will not go into depth regarding static compression ratio as an individual thing, but I will summarise on a significant key point. What people need to get their head around is 'dynamic compression ratio', this is what makes or breaks an engine. Static or dynamic compression ratio is NOT something which should be considered as a single separable factor when building an engine either. Like camshaft choice, headwork, valve sizing, turbocharger size, dynamic compression ratio is a single ingredient and should be considered as part of the WHOLE engine build. This sounds pretty much like common sense but dynamic compression is something which a lot of people overlook and unless an engine is built as a complete system with everything working on a complimentary basis, it will only dissapoint.
Ergo, in summary, if a 9:1 or more correctly 9.5:1 engine were to be built to 'work PERECTLY without any problems' it would need some careful thought if you want it to last and make decent power, (assuming this is what you were referring to Jim). I say this as I have seen you running more and more and more boost over your build progress on otherwise stock cams.